
I have had the chance to use these players with some very high end equipment and indeed the improvements I get from these players are good enough to warrant the purchase. Appendix: The Concept Of Neutrality –.I’ll start with the table of contents for those of you who want to skip a section or two. There are a lot of things I missed in terms of covering each player in detail, but if you’d post it on the comments section I will try to fill them in. Anyway I hope you guys will find this to be helpful. I realize that despite clocking in over 7,000 words, the article is far from perfect, but it’s been a crazy few months keep so finally I decide to publish this article and get on with working on more normal reviews. Many of these players offer such a rich level of control and customization, and it is beyond the scope of this review to try to cover every single function offered by each player. After I started working on this article, I realized that it’s quite a crazy project to take on, but I realize that if I only did a comparative of three different products then it’s only a matter of time before someone come and ask “how does this compare to that?”. Comparative reviews are always difficult to do, especially when you have more than five different products in one article. In total, I’ve tested a total of nine players: three from Sonic Studio (Amarra, MINI, and Junior), Audirvana and Audirvana+, Pure Music, Fidelia, Decibel, and BitPerfect.

The last few months, I’ve tried and tested the majority of available audio players for OS X.
Audirvana plus 3 worth it mac#
Even though Windows users still represent a big part of Headfonia readers, I choose to focus on OS X for now because it’s easier to do as I use Mac myself, but also because for most developers, OS X seems to be the platform of choice when it comes to high quality audio playback.

Audirvana plus 3 worth it mac os x#
Sometime in 2011 I began thinking about the possibility of doing a review on high quality audio players for the Mac OS X operating system.
